Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3366 (RAJ)

SMT. SAGUNA KATARA D/O SHRI MANK LAL KATARA, W/O BANWARI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/47/2025 · 2025-01-15

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2089] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 47/2025 1. Smt. Saguna Katara D/o Shri Mank Lal Katara, W/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 05, Hadamatiya Fala, Rastapal Rasta, Simalwara, Dungarpur, Rajasthan. Presently Residing At Heera Man Ji Ka Chabutra, Baswara, Indergarh, Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Banwari Lal S/o Shri Kedar Lal, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Heera Man Ji Ka Chabutra, Baswara, Indergarh, Bundi, Rajasthan. Presently Residing At Heera Man Ji Ka Chabutra, Baswara, Indergarh, Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs And Justice, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi, Rajasthan. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Bundi, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 5. Mank Lal Katara S/o Shri Hazanana Katara, Resident Of Ward No. 05, Hadamatiya Fala, Rastapal Rasta, Simalwara, Dungarpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Berwal, Adv. Mrs. Saguna with Mr. Banwari Lal (petitioners in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 15/01/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry are waived. [2025:RJ-JP:2089] (2 of 2) [CRLW-47/2025] 2. Petitioners are present in person and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent(s) as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are major and have solemnized marriage on their own free will. Copy of marriage certificate dated 18.11.2024 has been annexed with the writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but family member who is respondent No.5 is not happy with their marriage. It is further submitted that the petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, therefore, they should be protected. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Bundi and respondent No.2 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /529