Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3366 (JHR)

KAILASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/569/2025 · 2025-08-07

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22465 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 569 of 2025 Kailash Kumar, aged about 48 years, Son of Mani Sahu, residing at-Village- Bhandra, P.O. & P.S.- Bhandra, District-Lohardaga, Jharkhand (835302) ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of Tourism, Arts, Culture, Sports & Youth Affairs, P.O.& P.S.- Dhurwa, Ranchi-834006 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga, Zila Samaharnalay. Vikas Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Lohardaga, District-Lohardaga (835302) 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Lohardaga-cum-Senior Incharge Officer, Pesharar Block Zila Samaharnalay, Vikas Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Lohardaga, District- Lohardaga (835302) 5. The Executive Engineer, National Rural Employment Program, Lohardaga, Zila Samaharnalay, Vikas Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Lohardaga, District- Lohardaga (835302) 6. The District Sports Officer, Lohardaga, Zila Samaharnalay, Vikas Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Lohardaga, District-Lohardaga (835302) .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, A.C to Sr.S.C-I 03/07.08.2025 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that admitted dues have already been paid to the petitioner and he has instruction from the client not to pursue the present writ petition. Accordingly, permission has been sought for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent State has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty