1 2025:CGHC:30058-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1492 of 2022 1 - Tejesh Kumar Chandrakar S/o Shri Chhannu Lal Chandrakar Aged About 33 Years R/o Quarter No. 15, Street C, Phase 1, Simran City, Matthpuraina, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shri Chhannu Lal Chandrakar S/o Khuman Singh Chandrakar Aged About 58 Years R/o Quarter No. 15, Street C, Phase - 1, Simran City, Matthpuraina, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Yogeshwari Chandrakar W/o Shri Chhannu Lal Chandrakar Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Matiya, Post - Mahud, Teh. - Gunderdehi, District - Balod (C.G.) 4 - Ajay Chandrakar S/o Shri Chhannu Lal Chandrakar Aged About 28 Years R/o Quarter No.15, Street C, Phase - 1, Simran City, Matthpuraina, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) (Address Of Petitioners Wrongly Mentioned In Fir) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Baloda, District - Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Swati Bala Chandrakar W/o Tejesh Kumar Chandrakar Aged SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.07.05 12:21:26 +0530 2 About 29 Years R/o Panchsheel Nagar, Baloda Bazar, P.S. - Baloda, District - Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 03.07.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer :- It is therefore, prayed that the instant CRMP may be allowed and the F.I.R. No. 691/2022, Police Station- Baloda, Distt. -Baloda Bazar dated 27/08/2022 and the subsequent criminal investigation initiated against the petitioners may be quashed, in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners today itself before the Registry of this Court. Hence he is permitted to argue in the matter. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law as after due investigation, the charge sheet has been filed before the learned trial Court and the charges have been framed against the petitioners and they wishes to challenge the charge framing order. 3 4. Accordingly, the instant CRMP is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra. 5. Consequently, the interim relief granted earlier in favour of the petitioners stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar/ Jyoti