Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33659 (BOM)

Santaram dajiba dongare v. State of Maharashtra through its chief secretary Mantralay Mumbai 32

CP/1077/2024 · 2025-09-24

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 922-CP-1077-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2024 IN WP/4254/2023 Santaram Dajiba Dongare ….Petitioner VERSUS State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Secretary Mantralay Mumbai & Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K.S. Patil, AGP for State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SMT. VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. Learned AGP has placed on record copy of Government Resolution dated 22.09.2025, sanctioning the amount of compensation to be paid to the petitioner. He submits that within one week the amount will be disbursed to the petitioner. The Government Resolution dated 22.09.2025 is marked ‘X’ for identification purposes. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner disputes the quantum of the amount paid to him. 3. We cannot go into the disputed questions of facts in the contempt jurisdiction. Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:26319-DB {2} 922-CP-1077-2024 4. By accepting the statement made by learned AGP as undertaking to this court, contempt petition is disposed of. 5. If the petitioner has any grievance left, he may adopt appropriate legal remedy. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde