Smt. P. Sudha Rani, v. The Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Rep. its E.O.
WP/38281/2013 · 2025-03-28
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33655 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33655 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH dXy OF MARCH ” | TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAFTRAO WRIT PETITION NO: 38281 OF 2013 Between:
1. Smt. P. Sudha Rani, W/o. P. Chandra Sekhar, aged about 47 Years, ^ Occ: Superintendent, Sri. Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada. 2. P. Chandra Sekhar, S/o. Chalamaiah, aged about 48 Years, Occ; Sjcf^erintendent, Sri Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada. Both R/o. Flat No. 201, Garuda Crest Apts, Zion High School, Gunadala, Vijayawada. ...PETITIONERS AND
1. ;rhe Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Rep. its E.O., Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal, Secretary, Department of Endowments, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3.^ The Commissioner of Endowments, Dharmika Bhavan, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Krishna District, Vijayawada. 5. Jhe Regional Joint Commissioner, Multi Zone -1, Department of Endowments, Kakinada. 6. The Regional Vigilence and Enforcement Officer, D.No. 54-15-1/2, Road No.1, Venkatewara Colony, Vijayawada - 8. ...RESPONDENTS
f Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in ■ the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 1)e pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly may one in nature of writ of mandamus, by calling records, declaring the action of the respondent No.1 and 3 trying to transfer the petitioners based on frivolous and vexatious charges which are in the nature of violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to 4 to conduct detailed the acts of the respondent No.1 EO., along with his CC to E.O., by filing detailed report of their indecent behavior and harassment of the Petitioner No.1 in the work place. enquiry in I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013rWPMP. NO: 47593 OF 20131 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court be pleased direct the respondent No.1 and 3 to not to transfer the petitioners from their respective posts in respondent No.1 temple, pending disposal of the writ petition. may I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP. NO: 1909 OF 20161 Between: The Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Rep. its E.O., Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada. ...VACATE PETITIONER/R1 AND
1.
Smt. P. Sudha Rani, W/o. P. Chandra Sekhar, aged about 47 Years, Occ: Superintendent, Sri. Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada. 2. P. Chandra Sekhar, S/o. Chalamaiah, aged about 48 Years, Occ: Durgamalleswara Swamy Devastanam, Superintendent, Sri Indrakeeladri, Vijayawada. Both R/o. Flat No. 201, Garuda Crest Apts, Zion High School, Gunadala, Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS
3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal, Secretary, Department of Endowments, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Endowments, Dharmika Bhavan, Boggulakunta Hyderabad. The District Collector, Krishna District, Vijayawada. The Regional Joint Commissioner, Multi Zone -1, Department of Endowments, Kakinada. The Regional Vigilence and Enforcement Officer, D.No. 54-15-1/2, Road No.1, Venkatewara Colony, Vijayawada - 8. 4. 5. 6. 7. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP.No.47593/201 3 in WP No.138281/2013, dated: 27.12.2013. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 22514 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Respondent No.1 to file the Counter Affidavit. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI V. GOPALA RAO AMANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI K. MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 & 6 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.38281 of 2013
ORDER: Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It evinces that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the present, Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEcrrdN officer To, 1 ...One CC to Sri V.Gopala Rao Amancharla, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3,, Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
4. ’One CC to Sri K. Madhava Reddy. (SC for Endowments) [OPUC]
5. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr
HIGH COURT DATED:28/03/2025 0 8 APR 2025 ^ . Current Section
ORDER WP.No.38281 of 2013 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS