[2025:JHHC:31255 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI CrMP No. 3233 of 2018 1. Ruchi Singh, aged about 46 years, wife of Sri Uday Pratap Singh; 2. Uday Pratap Singh, aged about 55 years, son of Late Parasnath Singh; 3. Shakuntala Singh, aged about 63 years, wife of Late Mandhata Singh, Petitioners no 1, 2 and 3 are residents of K-285, Aashiana, Lucknow, P.O. and P.S. Aashiana, Dist.-Lucknow (U.P.) 4. Nishant Singh @ Nishant Kumar Singh, aged about 43 years, son of Late Mandhata Singh, permanent resident of Sector 4C, Qr. No. 2034, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.-Sector 4, District- Bokaro (Jharkhand), and 5. Prashant Kumar Singh, aged about 38 years, son of Late Mandhata Singh, resident of 12A, Anmol Kunj, First Cross, Satyam Street, Munnekollal, Marathahalli, P.O. & P.S. Bangalore, Dist. Bangalore (Karnataka). … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Yogendra Kumar Singh, son of late Kameshwar Pd. Singh, residents of Abhay Sundari School Road, Hirapur, P.O.& P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand), and 3. Nupur Singh, wife of Prashant Kumar Singh, daughter of Yogendra Kumar Singh, at present resident of of Abhay Sundari School Road, Hirapur, P.O.& P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad … Opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kumar ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen , Addl. PP For the O.P.no. 2 : Mr. Anil Kr. Singh ,Adv. 09 / 08.10.2025 I.A. No. 12486 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer to delete the name of the petitioner no. 3 namely Shakuntala Singh who died on 26.02.2025 during the pendency of the criminal miscellaneous petition. Learned counsel for the opp. Party no. 2 has no serious objection. Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer to delete the name of the petitioner no. 3 is allowed. The registry is directed to delete the name of the petitioner no. 3 from the cause title of this criminal miscellaneous petition and renumber the petitioner no. 4 and 5 as the petitioner no. 3 and 4 respectively with Red Ink. This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) CrMP No. 3233 of 2018 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission of the court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to raise all the grounds mentioned in the petition before appropriate court at appropriate stage. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 08.10.2025 Smita/-