[2025:RJ-JP:2433] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 337/2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5904/2006 1. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 2. The Dy. Director (Sec. Education), Jaipur Division, Jaipur. 3. District Education Officer, (Madhaymik-Ii), Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ravindra Prasad Gupta S/o Sh. Manohar Lal Gupta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Halena, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, At Present Working As U.d.c. In The Govt. Secondary School, Jharkhai, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur. 2. The Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Mini Secretariat, Bani Park, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Namita Parihar, Dy.GC. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/01/2025 1. Matter comes up on Misc. Application No.337/2024 for seeking clarification/modification of the order dated 05.09.2024 passed by this Court, while deciding the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5904/2006. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid writ petition was decided by this Court vide order dated 05.09.2024 and the impugned order dated 08.10.2004 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur was quashed and set aside. Counsel further submits that in Para-2 due [2025:RJ-JP:2433] (2 of 2) [WMAP-337/2024] to typographical error, the word "counsel for the respondent- State" was typed in the place of "counsel for the petitioner-State". Counsel further submits that in Para-5 (last para) of the order, instead of "the instant writ petition stands disposed of" the word "the instant writ petition is hereby dismissed" was typed due to typographical error. Counsel submit that for the above clarification/ modification, this application has been preferred. 3. Application stands allowed for the reasons stated therein. It is clarified that in Para-2, the word "counsel for the respondent- State" be read as "counsel for the petitioner-State" as well as in Para-5 (last para), the word "the instant writ petition is hereby dismissed" be read as "the instant writ petition stands disposed of" 4. With the aforesaid modification, the instant application stands disposed of. This order be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 05.09.2024passed by this Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/16