Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33643 (RAJ)

MONIK KUMAWAT S/O SHRI SUJIT KUMAR KUMAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18898/2024 · 2025-02-25

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18898/2024 Monik Kumawat S/o Shri Sujit Kumar Kumawat, Aged About 20 Years, R/o 27A, Shriram Colony, Opp. Khetan Hospital, Dehar Ke Balaji, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Department of Medical Education, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET), National Testing Agency (NTA), Ministry of Education, Department of Higher Education, through its Director, First Floor, NSIC- MDBP Building, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi, Delhi- 110020 4. NEET UG Conseling-2024, through its Chairman, Neet UG Medical And Dental Admission/Counseling Board-2024 SMS Medical College, JLN Marg, Jaipur. 5. Principal, Government Medical College, Dholpur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalit Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. M.S. Raghav with Mr. Vishwas Saini Mr. Sandeep Pathak with Mr. Arnav Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 25/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted its online application for NEET-UG (Medical/Dental) [2025:RJ-JP:8520] (2 of 4) [CW-18898/2024] Counseling-2024 (MBBS, BDS) however, due to an inadvertent error, in the column of ‘name of father’, the petitioner mentioned his own name as “Monik Kumawat” instead of his father name as “Sujit Kumar Kumawat”; this bonafide mistake came in knowledge of the petitioner when he received the Permission Letter for appearing in the said examination. 2. It is further submitted that when the petitioner did not receive any redressal from the respondents, including the respondent-Director General of Health Services, he was bound to knock the doors of this Court. Thence, the present petition is filed with the following prayers: “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record, relating to the case and after perusing the same may be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition. i) by issuance of an appropriate writ order of direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to correct the name of the father of the petitioner in his online application form and further consequential record/documents as “Sujit Kumar Kumawat” instead of “Monik Kumawat” and allow him to pursue his MBBS in the Government Medical College, Dholpur as per Provisional Allotment Letter dated 30.10.2024. ii) Any other appropriate relief, which is deemed just and proper in above mentioned facts and circumstances, may also be granted to the petitioner alongwith the cost.” 3. Learned counsel for the respondents are unable to oppose the contentions that the mistake/error in question was on account of bonafide mistake, however, counsel for respondent-NTA has submitted that vide Annexure-13, the respondents have already informed the candidate/petitioner that the respondent-NTA has already handed over the entire records to the Office of Director [2025:RJ-JP:8520] (3 of 4) [CW-18898/2024] General of Health Sciences and cannot carry out any corrections, at this juncture. 4. Learned counsel Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Adv. appearing for Director General of Health Sciences has submitted that if representation is filed within a period of seven days, from the date of passing of this order, the respondents will carry out the due corrections and initiate the requisite correspondence with the respondent-NTA. 5. Heard and considered. 6. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the instant matter, taking note of the submissions made insofar, and the fact that the petitioner due to a bonafide mistake has mistakenly interchanged the credentials of name of the father and the candidate himself, this Court directs the respondent-Director General of Health Services to carry out the due corrections at their end and also directs National Testing Agency to consider the same, by appropriate process and mode of operation, permitting the petitioner/candidate to appear in the said examination and consequential selection process, subject to the representation being filed by the petitioner, within an upper limit of seven days from the date of receipt of this order. 7. However, on account of the fact that the petitioner has approached this Court at a belated juncture and has caused inconvenience to the respondents, this Court directs the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) with the Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur and National Eligibility Entrance Test [2025:RJ-JP:8520] (4 of 4) [CW-18898/2024] (NEET), National Testing Agency (NTA), Ministry of Education, Department of Higher Education, through its Director, First Floor, NSIC-MDBP Building, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi separately/respectively. 8. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GARIMA /740