NVVNK DURGA VARA PRASAD v. SRI DWARAKA TIRUMALA RAO IPS
CC/4378/2024 · 2025-01-09
Harinath N
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33641 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
uiMk IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4378 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents herein personally and punish them for their willful, intentional and deliberate violation of the
order passed in W.P.No.16914 of 2013, dated 19.02.2024. Between: NWNK Durga Vara Prasad, S/o. Sri Venkat Rao, R/o. PSP Rama Raju, APSRTC Rtd. Depot Clerk, 14-46-22/1, 30th Ward, Umgaralavari Street, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District Presently Working as Driver (E.No.700424), O/o. The Depot Manager, APSRTC., Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND
1. Sri. Dwaraka Tirumala Rao IPS, Chairman and Managing Director, The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation RTC X Roads, Hyderabad. Presently Rep. by its Managing Director, Pandit Nehru Bus Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
r Sri N. Vara Prasad, The Regional Manager / District Public Transfer Officer, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, West Godavari Region, Eluru. Presently at Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
2.
3. Sri YSN Murthy, Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Tadepalligudem, West Godavari. ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the wages for the period from 06.06.2013 to 19.12.2013 and increments, as the writ petition was allowed holding that the proceedings No.01/498/04/13-TPG, dated 06.06.2013 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V PADMANABHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following ORDER:
r APHC010506582024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4378/2024 Between: Nvvnk Durga Vara Prasad ...PETITIONER AND Sri Dwaraka Tirumala Rao Ips and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...CONTEMNOR(S) 1.VPADMANABHA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC)
2. The Court made the following:
2
ORDER; Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present Contempt is filed challenging the inaction of the respondents in implementing the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.16914 of 2013, dated 19.02.2024.
3. The petitioner challenged the proceedings dated 06.06.2013, by which the respondents required the petitioner to discharge the duty of a conductor while performing the role of a driver. This Court after considering the issue on merit set aside the impugned
4. proceedings and allowed the writ petition. The respondents, in their counter, submit that the
order has been
5. implemented, the petitioner was paid the annual increment due, and that the respondents have followed the Standard Operating Procedure in vogue.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the same and submits that the petitioner was not paid for the period from 06.06.2013 to 19.12.2013, and that increments due from August 2013 were not paid.
7. As seen from the counter in the contempt, the respondents have stated that the annual increments are also paid.
8. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Rule 11 of the Pay and Allowances Regulations, 1964 is not followed. It is for the petitioner to take up the issue with the respondents by making necessary representation seeking the dues, if any, and the respondents would decide it on its own merits.
r 3 Insofar as the contempt is concerned, this Court finds that the order with
9. respect to setting aside the impugned proceedings has been implemented. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the
10. petitioner to take steps, if any further dues to be claimed from the respondents by making appropriate representation. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR SEC^TKJf^OFFICER
1. Sri Dwaraka Tirumala Rao IPS, Chairman and Managing Director, The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation RTC X Roads, Hyderabad. Presently Rep. by its Managing Director, Pandit Nehru Bus Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
2. Sri N. Vara Prasad, The Regional Manager / District Public Transfer Officer, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, West Godavari Region, Eluru. Presently at Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
3.
Sri YSN Murthy, Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Transport Corporation Tadepalligudem, West Godavari.
4. One CC to Sri. V Padmanabha Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
5. One CC to Sri Vinod Kumar Tarlada (SC for APSRTC) [OPUC]
6. Three CD Copies //TRUE COPY// To Road MKP sree
HIGH COURT DATED :09/01/2025
ORDER CC.No.4378 of 2024 and«^ g 0 7 FEB 2025 m Co. . Current Section , ^ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS