IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Gurdawar Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioners. Ms. Samdisha Kaur, AAG, Punjab. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, representation petitioners. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the meri case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. decision on the of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity o hearing to all concerned, preferably within one a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, t would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. May 22, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6926-2025 Date of Decision : Gurdawar Singh and others …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Davinder S. Dadwal, Advocate, or the petitioners. Ms. Samdisha Kaur, AAG, Punjab. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar-respondent No. representation dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P- Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the meri case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. decision on the representation dated 22.01.2025 (Annexure P of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity o concerned, preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, t would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.05.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the No.3 to take a decision on the -18), made on behalf of the Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a (Annexure P-18), made on behalf of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of month from the date of receipt of Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.05.27 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document