Mahendra Singh Markam And Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.
WPS/5909/2014 · 2025-03-19
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3364 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3364 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (WPS No. 5909 of 2014)
2025:CGHC:13085
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5909 of 2014 1 - Mahendra Singh Markam S/o Sup Singh Markam Aged About 50 Years R/o Near Kailash Rice Mill Village And Post Neora Ps. And Tah. Tilda Dist. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Arvind Kerketta S/o Sirjius Kerketta Aged About 44 Years R/o C-11, Avani Vihar Daldal Soeni, Mowa Ps. Mowa District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shyam Charan Bhuarya S/o Jagdish Ram Bhuarya Aged About 42 Years R/o Parashu Ram Ward Post, Tah. And Ps. Bhatapara District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Through Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya Bhawan New Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Of Public Instruction School Education Department, Pension Badar Road, Shailendra Nagar Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer School Education Department Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For State :- Mr. Afroz Khan, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.03.21 11:14:37 +0530
2 (WPS No. 5909 of 2014) SB-
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
19.03.2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions.
2. In view of the above, as the petitioner’s counsel has no instructions from the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!