Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33639 (RAJ)

HARBHAJAN MEENA SON OF SONYA MEENA v. BABULAL SON OF HARINARAYAN MEENA

CRW/2/2024 · 2025-01-06

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:591] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 2/2024 Harbhajan Meena Son Of Sonya Meena, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Babulal Son Of Harinarayan Meena, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 2. Jaina Son Of Mohan Lal Meena, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 3. Dhapoo Wife Of Jaina, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Kailash Son Of Jaina, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur. 5. Ramkesh Son Of Jaina, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur. 6. Manthara Wife Of Chiranjilal (Deceased) Son Jaina, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur. 7. Murari Son Of Chirnjilal (Deceased) Son Jaina, Resident Of Peepalwada, Tehsil Baunli, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinodi Lal Mathur, Adv. with Mr. Amit Dhawan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 06/01/2025 This civil review petition has been filed seeking review of the order dated 09.10.2023 passed by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:591] (2 of 2) [CRW-2/2024] There is no error apparent on the face of the record, so as to review the order dated 09.10.2023 moreso, when the scope of review under Order 47 Rule 1 is very limited. So, present review petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /69