IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2931 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of india aggrieved by the Order dated 15/04/2022 in lA No.66 of 2022 in OS No.48/2022 on the file of the court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Prathipadu East Godavari District. Between: Kotteti Rayudu, S/o.Late Bapanayya, aged 63 years, R/0 Eluru Village Prathipadu Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh-533432 ...PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND 1. Dadisetti Venkata Ramana, S/o Suryananarayana, aged 47 years R/oNear Yegulamma Temple, Eluru Village, Prathipadu Mandal East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh-533432. 2. DadisettiSrinu,, S/o Satyanarayana, aged 41 years, R/o Near Yegulamma Temple, Eluru Village, PrathipaduMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh-533432. 3. Dadisetti Surya Chakravarthi @ Suryachakram,, S/o Veerabhadram @VeerabhadraRao, aged 41 years, R/o Near Yegulamma Temple, Eluru Village, PrathipaduMandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh-533432 r ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS : SRI JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER : r 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 2931 of 2024 Between: Kotteti Rayudu ...PETITIONER AND Dadisetti Venkata Ramana and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr.JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): -None- I 2 The Court made the following Order: The present Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by non-disposal of IANo.66 of 2022 in O.S.No.48 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Prathipadu. V 2. Heard Ms.Krishna Deepthi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice to the respondents is deemed not necessary as the grievance is non-disposal of Interlocutory Application. 3. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.48 of 2022 referred to above. He filed the said suit for permanent injunction against the defendants and their henchmen restraining them from ever interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and for costs of the suit. Along with the suit, he filed I.A.No.66 of 2022 under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘C.P.C.’), I seeking ad-interim exparte injunction against the respondents/defendants and their henchmen restraining them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner / plaintiff over the plaint schedule property. In the said I.A., the respondents also filed counter- affidavit on 22.06.2022 and the same is pending. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, submits that though the suit was filed in the year 2022 along with above said I.A., the same has not been taken up for consideration by the learned Trial Court and the matter is being adjourned from time to time. She submits that as per the Rule 3 A of 3 Order XXXIX of C.P.C., the Court ought to have dispose of the petition seeking ad-interim injunction within a period of thirty days and that unless a direction is issued by this Court to dispose of the said I.A., expeditiously, the petitioner would suffer serious prejudice and irreparable loss. 5. Considering the submissions made and perusing the averments made this Court is inclined to dispose of the Revision Petition, providing that the learned Trial Judge shall make endeavour to dispose of I.A.No.66 of 2022 in O.S.No.48 of 2022 on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Rr ' SECTI^ OFFICER To. 1. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Prathipadu, East Godavari District. 2. One CC to SRI. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 3. THREE CD COPIES TAC 1?“ HIGH COURT DATED:10/01/2025 ORDER CRP.No.2931 of 2024 ^ 15 FEB 2025 \\ ^ . Current Section ^ ov DISPOSSING THE CRP