2025:JHHC:31776 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C. M. P. No. 889 of 2025 ----- Binoy Kumar Jha aged about 61 years son of Late Nityanand Jha, resident of Mouza Jamuni, P.O. and P.S. Pathrol, Sub-Division Madhupur, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) Petitioner … …. Petitioner Versus 1. Falguni Debya wife of Late Parmanand Jha, resident of Mouza Jamuni, P.O. and P.S. Pathrol, Sub-Division Madhupur, District Deoghar. 2. Kalyani Debya wife of Late Basudeo Jha 3. Madhukant Jha son of Late Basudeo Jha 4 Nand Rani Debya wife of Ashok Kumar Jha 5. Arun Kumar Jha son of Late Ashok Kumar Jha 6. Subhash Chandra Jha son of Late Parmanand Jha O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 are residents of Mouza Jamuni, P.O. & P.S. Pathrol, Sub-Division-Madhupur District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 7. Baldeo Jha son of Late Govind Pd. Jha, resident of Village Jamuni, P.O. Pathrol, P.S. Pathrol, Sub-Division Madhupur, District Deoghar. 8. Sabitri Debya wife of Late Shaligram Jha 9. Satyam Kumar Jha son of Late Shaligram Jha 10. Vijay Kumar Jha son of Late Shaligram Jha O.P. Nos.8 to 10 are residents of Mouza Jamuni, P.O. and P.S. Pathrol, Sub-Division Madhupur, District Deoghar … …. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amar Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. parties : ----- Oral Order 05 / Dated : 14.10.2025 1. The petitioner is plaintiff and the instant civil misc. petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 27.03.2025 passed in Original Suit No. 228 of 2022 by which the amendment application filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC has been allowed for incorporating the following amendments in the written statement: “At page no. 5 in para 12 of the written statement dated 04.03.2023 in the 5th line the digit “22” be deleted and in its place, the digit “28” be added by considering the registered adoption deed which was registered on 28.01.1967 and not on 22.01.1967.” 2025:JHHC:31776 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the amendment has been made after commencement of trial. 3. Considering the nature of amendment, I do not find any infirmity as it is only a typographical error in nature, without causing any prejudice to the Petitioner. This civil misc. petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satyendra Uploaded 15.10.2025