2025:JHHC:31664 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1201 of 2023 ---- Sarju Thakur, Son of Late Puran Thakur, aged about 73 years, Resident of Village- Yograychhrat, P.O-Bhojpur, P.S-Devipur, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Department of Land Reforms, Revenue and Registration, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office Dhurwa at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. District Ranchi 3. The Anti Corruption Bureau, having its office at Adre House, P.O-G.P.O, P.S. Gonda, District - Ranchi 4. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Dumka, P.O and P.S-Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O and P.S-Deoghar and District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) 6. The District Collector Land Reforms Deoghar, P.O and P.S-Deoghar and District-Deoghar (Jharkhand) 7. The Sub-Divisional Officer Deoghar, P.O and P.S Deoghar and District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) 8. The Circle Officer Devipur, P.O and P.S -Devipur and District-Deoghar (Jharkhand) 9. Renu Devi, aged about 54 years wife of Subal chaudhary 10. Subal chaudhary, S/o Randhani Chaudhary, Respondents Nos. 9 & 10, are resident of House No.139, Ward No.-04, Ambedkar Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District-Deoghar 11. Dipu Yadav @Suvash Yadav 12. Sudhir Yadav both son are Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Ledo Yadav @ Mahto 13. Digo Rana, S/o Late Jhari Rana, respondents nos. 11, 12 & 13, Resident are Village-Gidhaya, P.O-Bhojpur, P.S-Devipur District-Deoghar, Jharkhand 14. Dinanath Singh @ Jhuni Singh, son of Mithlesh Singh, Resident of Mohallah- Bela Bagan Police Line P.O & P.S.- Nagar Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Shyam Sundar Prasad Kushwaha, Adv. For the Resp.-State : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V For the Resp Nos.9, 10 & 14 : Mr. A. Allam, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Faisal Allam, Adv. : Ms. Sushmita Kumari, Adv. : Mrs. Asfia Sultana, Adv. ---- 09/Dated: 14th October, 2025 2025:JHHC:31664 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- (i.) For quashing the order dated 15.06.2022 passed in Miscellaneous Case No.10/2022 (Annexure-10) by Respondent No. 4 (Commissioner Santhal Pargana Dumka) is complete violation of settled principle of law whereby and whereunder the Respondent No.4, passed a cryptic, erroneous order upon application of the petitioner decided right, title and interest for lands pertaining to Jamabandi No.6 in Khesra no.10, 11 and 13 Area 2.23 dismal of mouza Yograichhorat No.317 recorded in the name of Biro Napit, wo Gurucharan Napit, S/o Bhatu Napit, wo Niro Napit S/o Khubhi Napit and GANTZER'S SETTELMENT since 10.02.1947 in favour of Respondent Nos. 9 to 10 in a arbitrary manner which is complete violation of the statutory rules and in specific contravention to the law. (ii.) For commanding upon the respondents particularly respondent Nos.1 and 3 for initiating proceeding against respondent No.4 who has passed an errenous illegal order dated 15.06.2022 in Miscellaneous Case No.10/2022 exceeding his jurisdiction decided illegally right, title and interest over the land in question situated at Mauza-mouza Yograichhorat Jamabandi No.6 in Khesra No.10, 11 and 13, Area 2.23 dismal. (iii.) For commanding upon the respondents particularly respondent Nos.5 to 8 for maintaining peaceful possession of the petitioner for the land in question situated at Mouza Yograichhorat Jamabandi No.6 in Khesra Nos.10, 11 and 13, Area 2.23 dismal. (iv.) For that this Hon'ble Court may pleased to set up the enquiry against the respondents who had made forged judgment dated 26.10.1977 typist typed dated 22.12.1976-77 in sampust Case No.121/76-77 in the Court of Learned Deputy Collector Land Reforms Deoghar, Renu Devi vs Bhoodan Yagya Committee Deoghar (Annexure-9). 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law including the Civil Court. 4. Learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 6. It is hereby, clarified that any finding recorded in the impugned order dated 15.06.2022 passed by Commissioner Santhal Pargana, Dumka in Miscellaneous Case No.10 of 2022 will not affect either of the parties. 7. Pending, interlocutory application, if any, also stand disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 14th October, 2025 Raja/-Uploaded