Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33629 (HP)

LAJYA DEVI AND OTHERS v. SATISH KUMAR AND OTHERS

RSA/70/2025 · 2025-06-20

Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Mohan Lal Vs. Ram Lal (deceased) through LRs alongwith connected matter. RSA No. 533 of 2025 alongwith RSA No. 284 of 2017 RSA No. 533 of 2005 19.12.2025 Present: Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, alongwith Mr.Harshit Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr.B.C. Verma, Advocate, for respondents, except respondent No. 2(b). Respondent No. 2(b) is stated to have expired. RSA No. 284 of 2017 Mr.Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr.B.C. Vema, Advocate, for the appellants, except appellant No. 2. Appellant No. 2 is stated to have expired. Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, alongwith Mr.Harshit Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. RSA No. 533 of 2005 Appropriate steps on account of death of respondent No. 2(b) be take within four weeks. List for further orders on 6th March,2026. CMP (M) No. 2000 of 2025 in RSA No. 284 of 2017 This application has been filed for substitution of appellant No. 2 Joginder Singh, who has expired on 14.5.2025. It has been submitted that there is no other legal heirs of appellant No. 2, except the legal heirs mentioned in para 3 of the application and proposed to be brought on record as appellants. No objection has been communicated for allowing the application. In view of above, appellant No. 2 is directed to be substituted through his legal heirs mentioned in para 3 of the application as appellants No. 2(a) to 2(c), respectively, after condonation of delay and setting aside abatement, if any. The application stands disposed of. RSA No. 248 of 2017 Amended memo of parties be filed within one week. Newly added appellants are duly represented through counsel. List for consideration alongwith RSA No. 533 of 2005. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge 19th December, 2025 (Keshav)