- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15869 MFA No. 6408 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6408 OF 2024 (CPC) BETWEEN: ANNABEL BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD., A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO. 1E, JHANDENWALA, NEW DELHI. AND ONE OF ITS OFFICES AT: NO. 356/1/1, DLF NEW TOWN BEGUR, AKSHAYA NAGAR MAIN ROAD OFF BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 068. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MS. REVATHY G. (LEGAL) …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHARAN A KUKREJA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15869 MFA No. 6408 of 2024 AND: 1. M. SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, SON OF LATE MUNINAGAPPA, RESIDING AT NO. 264, 9TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, VISHWAPRIYA NAGAR, BEGUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 068. 2. SHYLAJA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF M. SRINIVAS, RESIDING AT NO. 264, 9TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, VISHWAPRIYA NAGAR, BEGUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 068. 3. SHRAVYA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF M. SRINIVAS, RESIDING AT NO. 264, 9TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, VISHWAPRIYA NAGAR, BEGUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 068. 4. H.R. RAVICHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, SON OF LATE R. RAJASHEKHAR REDDY, RESIDING AT NO. 748, 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A. J. JAYARAM, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15869 MFA No. 6408 of 2024 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.06.2024 PASSED ON I.A. IN O.S.NO. 1353/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC. THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo dated 16.04.2025, stating that the very suit before the Trial Court is dismissed as settled and hence, the appeal does not survive for consideration. 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. The appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5