APHC010507252018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 23979/2018 Between: 1. P. DASARATHUDU, S/O.P.RAMA KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. FIELD MAN, O/O. DY.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CIVIL) APSRTC TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APSRTC REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR APSRTC, VIJAYAWADA STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE CHIEF PERSONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P AND D APSRTC, RTC HOUSE, PNBS, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER APSRTC, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE DIRECTOR OF VIGILANCE AND SECURITY OFFICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE SECURITY SUBINSPECTOR APSRTC, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.23979 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an order or orders are direction or a writ more particularly one in nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the action of respondent Nos.6 and 7 in proceeding with the investigation on the basis of the complaint lodged on 23-04-2018 by one Mr.A.AnjeneyaVara Prasad in spite of the report submitted by the Executive Engineer, APSRTC, Tirupati in his report No. Supdt/255/GEN/(1)/2018-19-EE/TPT, Dt.07.05.2018 is high handed, illegal, arbitrary, without power and jurisdiction and voilative of Principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequential direct the respondents not to proceed against the petitioner on the complaint dated 23.04.2018 lodged by Mr.A. Anjeneyavara Prasad in the interest of justice and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.08.2025 Pmk 4 11 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:23979 OF 2018 Date: 22.08.2025 Pmk