2025:HHC:42878 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18975 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Dr. Anita Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Another ….Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): While placing on record the Press Note dated 02.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Additional Secretary, H.P. Public Service Commission, enclosing therewith relieving order as well as experience certificate, Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioner, states that petitioner stands recommended for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor (Anaesthesia) at Dr. RPGMC, Tanda, District Kangra and she has been further relieved from her previous employment with All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur and as such, present petition can be disposed of with the direction to respondents to give appointment to the petitioner forthwith. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:42878 2 2. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, learned counsel representing the respondent No.2-Commission, while fairly acknowledging factum with regard to recommendation of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor (Anaesthesia) at Dr. RPGMC, Tanda, states that recommendation of the petitioner to the post concerned has been made, but the same is subject to outcome of the present writ petition for the reason that she, pursuant to order dated 01.12.2025 passed by this Court, was permitted to participate in the selection process provisionally. 3. At this stage, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, has attempted to argue that present petition has rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of accordingly. 4. In the case at hand, at first instance, candidature of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor (Anaesthesia) was not being accepted by the H.P. Public Service Commission for want of No Objection Certificate to be issued by AIIMS, Bilaspur, however, this Court, having taken note of Office Memorandum dated 24.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) issued under the signatures of Deputy Director (Admin), AIIMS, Bilaspur, coupled with the fact that petitioner was ready and willing to resign, after her selection, directed H.P. Public Service Commission to permit the petitioner to appear for interview for the post of Assistant Professor (Anaesthesia) provisionally, on the basis of NOC issued by AIIMS, Bilaspur. Since previous employer of the petitioner i.e. AIIMS, Bilaspur, has no objection, if any, to fresh appointment of the 2025:HHC:42878 3 petitioner pursuant to recommendations made by H.P. Public Service Commission, coupled with the fact that petitioner has been already relieved from her previous Institution at AIIMS, Bilaspur and in that regard, certificate already stands issued, this Court sees no impediment inasmuch as allowing the petition with the direction to respondents to ensure that appointment against the post of Assistant Professor (Anaesthesia) at Dr. RPGMC, Tanda, is given to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one week. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 09, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)