Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3362 (CHH)

RUKHMANI BAI VERMA v. BHARAT LAL

MCC/39/2023 · 2025-01-08

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.1 of 2 2025:CGHC:1224 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 39 of 2023 1 - Rukhmani Bai Verma Wd/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Manakchand Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Mahendra Kumar Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Anil Kumar Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ram Kumar Verma S/o Ram Gopal Verma Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Latuwa, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Bharat Lal S/o Ghondul Verma Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Lathuwa, Tahsil Balodabazar, District Raipur Now Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. B.L. Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent No.01 : None. For Respondent No.02 : Mr. Amit Buxy, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Date: 2025.01.09 16:16:05 +0530 Page No.2 of 2 Order On Board 08 . 01 .202 5 1. Heard. 2. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of SA No.31 of 2007 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 21.08.2019. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Order dated 21.08.2019 is hereby recalled. SA No.31 of 2007 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if