APHC010507212011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1584/2011 Between: 1. BANDI ADINARAYANA, S/O.LATE LAKSHMANNA FIELD ASSISTANT, OBULAPURAM VILLAGE,BATHALAPALLI MANDAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP DIST COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, NREGS, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPUR 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, ANANTHAPUR,ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/, PROGRAMME OFFICER, NREGS,BATHALAPALLI MANDAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned Order vide Roc.No.17/EGS/2009 dated 22.3.2010 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust without jurisdiction violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the guidelines framed under National Rural Employment Guarantee scheme and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Field Assistant in Obulapuram village, Bathalapalli Mandal, Ananthapur District with all monetary benefits. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 1920 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 3rd respondent vide Roc.No.17/EGS/2009 dated 22.3.2010 by directing to continue the 2 petitioner as Field Assistant in Obulapuram, Bathalapalli Mandal, Ananthapur District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. CH VEDAVANI 3. G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP,ZPP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 1584 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:1584 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP