1 2025:CGHC:37396 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7481 of 2025 1 - Harilal Dansena S/o Late Shri Bhudhar Prasad Dansena, Aged About 58 Years Working As Teacher, (L.B.), In Government Middle School, Bilaspur, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh, R/o Village Kiritmal, Post Kodtarai, Tehsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, School Education Department, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Cum President, Of The District Rationalization Committee, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Cum Member Secretary, Of The District Rationalization Committee Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Princpal/ Head Master, Government Middle School Bilaspur, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 8 - Principal / Headmaster, Government Middle School Vijaynagar, Block Dharamajaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.31 11:37:20 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 11.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved