APHC010507062011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL Between: 1. The Special Deputy Collector Kurnool District. AND 1. K Sudhakar Setty, S/o Rama Subbaiah, age: major Hosur Vilage, Pathikonda, Kurnool Dist Counsel for the Appellant: 1. GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondent: 1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following At the time of considering the matter, Mr.K.Devi Prasanna learned counsel representing the respondent/claimant against the market value fixed losers vide Award No.30 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.1003 of 2011 The Special Deputy Collector, [LA] HNSS, UNIT-III, Kurnool, ...Appellant , S/o Rama Subbaiah, age: major Hosur Vilage, Kurnool Dist. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent: O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J) At the time of considering the matter, Mr.K.Devi Prasanna learned counsel representing the respondent/claimant submits market value fixed in respect of the lands of some of the land vide Award No.30 of 2006, dated 09.12.2006, reference for [3495] THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO III, Kurnool, Appellant , S/o Rama Subbaiah, age: major Hosur Vilage, Respondent At the time of considering the matter, Mr.K.Devi Prasanna Kumar, submits that some of the land- eference for 2 LAAS_1003_2011 enhancement was sought, and in L.A.A.S. No.873 of 2011 and batch filed by the State, this Court was not inclined to interfere with the market value determined by the Reference Court. He placed a copy of the common judgment dated 19.9.2024 passed in L.A.A.S. No.873 of 2011 and batch. 2. Considering the said submissions and perusing the common judgment dated 19.9.2024, this Court finds merit in the same. 3. Therefore and for the reasons alike, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J ______________________ T MALLIKARJUNA RAO,J February 13, 2025 vasu