Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33612 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/9781/2025 · 2025-04-10

Manish Kumar Nigam

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53577 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9781 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vibha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the array of parties during the course of the day. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "I. Issue, writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No.4 not to interfere the peaceful possession of petitioner in respect of disputed land in question during the pendency of suit Under Section 229-B U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act as bearing No.T-201216674304 of 2012(Kapil Muni Versus State of U.P. & Others) is pending before learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Gyanpur, District-Bhadohi. II. Issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent to maintain status quo on spot not create the IIIrd parties right during the pendency of Suit No.T- 201216674304 of 2012 is pending before Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gyanpur, District-Bhadohi and parties maintain status quo on spot." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforementioned suit is pending before respondent no.2 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned suit in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the respondents, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and after giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad