Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33611 (CHH)

AYUSH KHESH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7587/2025 · 2025-07-17

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:34151 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7587 of 2025 1 - Ayush Khesh S/o Late Shri B.R. Khesh, Aged About 29 Years Presently Working As Washer Man (Dhobi) In Government Community Health Center, Baster, District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Joint Director, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Division - Baster, District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, District - Jagdalpur (Baster, C.G.) 4 - Block Medical Officer, Block - Baster, District - Jagdalpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Arpit Agrawal, Advocate. For State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 18.07. 202 5 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his prayer for a direction to the respondent No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner which he has filed on 31.07.2024 & 17.03.2025 seeking promotion to the higher post. 2. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the respondent No.3 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within stipulated time period. Digitally signed by INDRAJEET SAHU Date: 2025.07.18 18:50:39 +0530 2 3. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the petitioner and also considering the fact that representation of the petitioner is pending since 31.07.2024, without entering into the merits of the case the respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order before the respondent No.3 within a week. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder