APHC010506822008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA P WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI APPEAL SUIT Between: Karumanchi Hari Krishna Prasad Nidigonda Ramu and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 851/2008 Karumanchi Hari Krishna Prasad AND Nidigonda Ramu and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following: RADESH [3524] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 851/2008 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2008 passed in O.S.No.189 of 2007 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam, in not decreeing the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 05.06.2007 in toto in his favour. 2. Today, when the case is called, there is no representation. Even, at the revised call also, none appeared on either side. 3. As the matter pertains to the year 2008, it is listed in the “Weekly Cause-list” 4. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 19.03.2025 MDP