APHC010506492018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 23969/2018 Between: 1. N. SANJEEVARAYUDU, S/O THIMAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER OF SHOP NO 12, GODIGANUR VILLAGE, CHAGALAMARI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CIVIL SUPPLIES WING, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL SUPPLIES WING, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AP 4. THE TAHSILDAR C S, CHAGALAMARRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of manadamus declaring the action of the respondent in not alloting the stocks to the petitioners Fair Price Shop No.12, Godiganur Village, Chagalamari Mandal, Kurnool District, AP inspite of the fact that the petitioners authorisation is subsisting as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the APSPDS (Control) order, 2008 and consequently to direct the respondents to allot the stocks to the petitioners Fair Price Shop No 12, Godiganur Village, Chagalamari Mandal, Kurnool District in the interest of justice.and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the Respondents to allow the petitioner to distribute the essential commodities of Petitioners Fair Price Shop Nc 12, Godiganur Village, Chagalamari Mandal, Kurnool District, AP pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TRUPTHI AGARWAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:02.09.2025 KGR