- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2355 WP No. 24115 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 24115 OF 2022 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: M/S FIVE O TECHNOLOGY NO.50, 17TH CROSS, M.C. ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 40 REPRSENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SMT. MUTHU RAMASWAMY PARTNER REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SAKSHI PREM., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJAY J N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT OF KARNATKAA REP. BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY- DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD 4TH AND 5TH EAST WING 5TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001 RERPESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA FOR R1 SRI. B.B. PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2355 WP No. 24115 of 2022 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE A CONFIRMATION LETTER AND POSSESSION LETTER WITHOUT INSISTING FOR PAYMENT OF ANY ADDITIONAL AMOUNT INCLUDING INTEREST IN TERMS OF THE ORIGINAL ALLOTMENT LETTER IN ANNEXURE-B DTD 8.1.2018 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner and the learned Counsel for the petitioner have filed a memo dated 09.01.2025 stating that after filing of the writ petition, the respondent- authority has issued a ‘Confirmatory Letter of Allotment‘ dated 30.12.2024 as sought in this writ petition and therefore, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Liberty is also sought to the petitioner to file a fresh petition if need arises. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2355 WP No. 24115 of 2022 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. If the petitioner is aggrieved of any further orders or decision taken by the sub-committee of respondent-Board, the petitioner is free to pursue its remedy in accordance with law. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL