APHC010504112018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23688/2018 Between: 1. NARVANENI MURALI, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO AGED ABOUT 47YRS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O H.NO.6-6/B, RYTHUPET NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. CHIRUMAMILLA SRINIVASA RAO BUJJI, S/O LATE LAKSHMIPATHI AGED ABOUT 50YRS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O CHANDAPURAM VILLAGE NANDIGAMA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. P V RAMANA, INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature 2 of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondent No.1 in commencing the investigation in FIR No.174/2018, 175/2018 and 43/2018 and conducting the custodial interrogation and thereby cooperating with respondent No.4 in tampering the evidence as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to conduct the custodial interrogation in FIR No.174/2018, 175/2018 and 43/2018 forthwith and secure the forged and fabricated documents by recording the confession of respondent No.4 in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to conduct custodial interrogation in FIR No.174/2018, 175/2018 and 43/2018 forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. C V R RUDRA PRASAD 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondent No.1 in commencing the investigation in FIR No.174/2018, 175/2018 and 43/2018 and conducting the custodial interrogation and thereby cooperating with respondent No.4 in tampering the evidence as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to conduct the custodial interrogation in FIR No.174/2018, 175/2018 and 43/2018 forthwith and secure the forged and fabricated documents by recording the confession of respondent No.4 in the interest of justice.…” 2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.07.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23688 of 2018 Dated.15.07.2025 MH 67