Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3359 (RAJ)

THE DIRECTOR, RAJASTHAN AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD v. LAXMINARAYAN BAIRWA S/O SHRI BADRI PRASAD BAIRWA

WMAP/23/2025 · 2025-04-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 23/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3713/2023 1. The Director, Rajasthan Agriculture Marketing Board, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur. 2. The Financial Advisor, Rajasthan Agriculture Marketing Board, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur. ----Non-Applicant/Petitioners Versus 1. Laxminarayan Bairwa S/o Shri Badri Prasad Bairwa, Resident Of Roop Nagar Ii, 80 Feet Road, Mahesh Nagar Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Applicant/Respondents For Applicant(s) : Ms. Neha Swami Mr. Bhunesh Tiwari for Mr. Sandeep Saxena For Non-applicant(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/04/2025 1. Matter comes upon misc. application submitted by the applicant/respondent No.1 for seeking extension of the order dated 08.10.2024 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3713/2023. 2. Counsel for the applicant submits that the aforesaid petition was disposed of by this Court by granting liberty to the respondent No. 1 to file a representation before the concerned (2 of 2) [WMAP-23/2025] Department within a period of fifteen days and the concerned Department was directed to decide the same within a period of eight weeks thereafter by passing a reasoned order. Counsel submits that after passing of the aforesaid order, counsel for the respondent No.1 was tried to make contact with the respondent but he could not approach before the concerned department within the above stipulated time and slight delay has been occurred in filing the representation but the concerned department have not decided the same on its merit rather the same has been rejected on a technical count that the same was submitted after expiry the period of fifteen days. Counsel submits that under these circumstances, time for filing representation be extended and the department be directed to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 3. Considering the arguments put-forward by counsel for the applicant/respondent No.1 and the averments made in the application, the misc. application stands allowed and two weeks further time is granted to the applicant to file a detailed representation before the concerned Department. In case, the needful exercise is done within the above stipulated time, the concerned department would decide the same expeditiously within a period of eight weeks thereafter. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/87