2025:HHC:37064 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.1027 of 2019 Decided on: 03.11.2025 _________________________________________________________ Dr. Hardyal Chauhan ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Ms. Narvada, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Abhisek Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.5. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Ms. Narvada, Learned Vice Counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions, submits that due to subsequent events, the matter has been rendered infructuous and the petitioner is not interested to continue with the present proceedings. [Statement Taken on Record]. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by the opposite parties. In view of the above, the instant petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:37064 - 2 - rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 03, 2025 [Shivender]