IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CRM-M-16268-2025 Date of decision: 25.03.2025 Rajinder Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present : Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. **** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are seeking directions to be given to the official respondents to give seven days advance notice in view of the parameters/guidelines laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar : 2014(3) RCR (Criminal) 527. In addition, it has been submitted that a representation (Annexure P-1) dated 16.02.2025 was also given to respondent No.3-Commissioner of Police, Panchkula, however, it had been in vain as the petitioner was continuously being harassed at the hands of the private respondents, who wield considerable influence. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.3-Commissioner of Police, Panchkula, to look into the representation dated 16.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion. VINAY 2025.03.25 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-16268-2025 4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Rahul Mohan, Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.3-Commissioner of Police, Panchkula, to look into the representation dated 16.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same at the earliest, and take appropriate steps, if any required, in accordance with law. 25.03.2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2025.03.25 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment