VENGAMAMBA BHAKTAMANDALI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WA/952/2024 · 2025-01-20
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33585 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33585 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO . AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 952 OF ?n?/l Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the Judgment in W.P.No. 22836'of 2024 dated 14-10-2024, on the file of the High Court. '' Between: Vengamamba Bhaktamandali, Rep by its member, Thummala Vengaiah Chowdary, S/o Vengaiah, aged about 75 years, Occ: Business, R/o Vaddipalam Village, Narrawada Panchayat, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR District, AndhraPradesh. Nellore ...APPELLANT AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
2. The District Collector, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh
3. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
4. . The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kavali, SPSR Nellore District.
5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali, SPSR Nellore District.
6. The Tahsildar, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District
7. The Circle Inspector, Udayagiri, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District
8. The Sub Inspector, Duttaluru Police Station, Duttaluru Mandal Nellore District SPSR
9. Mallampati Guravaya, S/o. Mallampati Ramaswamy, Aged about 56 yrs, Occ- Business, R/o. Narrawada Village, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.
10. Maheshwararao, S/o. Lakshminarasaya, Aged about 50 yrs, Occ- Business, R/o. Narrawada Village, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District
11. Darapane Radhakrishna, S/o. Darapane Pothaiah, Aged about 50 yrs, Occ- Business, R/o. Narrawada Village, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI PAVULURI SREENIVASULU ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,3, 4, 7 & 8: GP FOR HOME- Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2, 5 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 9 to 11: —- The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010504492024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SEE SKi [3508] MONDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 952/2024 Between: ...APPELLANT Vengamamba Bhaktamandali AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Appellant:
1.PAVULURI SREENIVASULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
ORDER: The appellant had sought to file a complaint before the Police, on the ground that the 9*^ respondent had trespassed into the property of the society, represented by the petitioner and had locked up the premises forcibly and unlawfully. As this complaint was not being taken on record and investigated by the concerned Police Station, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of
2.
2 dismissed by the learned Single that the dispute was a private in the manner in which it was W.P.No.22836 of 2024. This Writ petition was
order dated 14.10.2024, holding , which cannot brought before this Court in Judge by dispute presented in the said writ petition. moved the present appeal.
3. Aggrieved by this order, the appellant has counsel for the appellant, now seeks permission of this Court take necessary steps, including Learned to withdraw approaching the Superintendent of Police vindication his rights.
4. this writ appeal with leave to and the concerned Magistrate for offence claimed by the for investigation into the petitioner. withdrawn with leave. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as
5.
Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, CC to Sri Pavuluri Sreenivasulu Advocate [OPUC]
1. One
2. TwoCCsto
3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue
4. Three CD Copies GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUTf TF
HIGH COURT DATED:20/01/2025
ORDER X 10 FEB 2025 'S ^ . Current becuon WA.No.952 of 2024 O DISMISSING THE W.A. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS