MOHD AYAZ AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/430/2022 · 2025-02-20
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3358 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3358 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No. CRM (M) No. 430/2022
Mohd. Ayaz and others …..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: None.
Vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.02.2025
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners in spite of calling in two rounds. There had been no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last the five consecutive dates. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the instant petition. Dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge Jammu : 20.02.2025 Pawan Chopra
Whether the order is speaking : Yes
Whether the order is reportable : No
Sr. No. 89 Pawan Chopra 2025.02.21 16:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document