Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3358 (GAU)

Kevitho Mining Pvt Ltd v. The Union of India and Anr

WP(C)/110/2025 · 2026-05-24

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040003902025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/110/2025 Kevitho Mining Pvt Ltd having its principal place of business situated at 16, Lane 2, Ward No.4, Chumukedima, Dimapur, Nagaland 797103 represented by its one of the Directors Shri Ari Makritsu, Son of Viyakiego Makritsu 16, Lane 2, Ward No.4, Chumukedima, Dimapur, Nagaland 797103 VERSUS The Union of India and Anr represented by Secretary, Ministry of Coal, Govt of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 110001 2:The Nominated Authority Age: 0 Occupation : Ministry of Coal Govt of India Room No. 120 F-Wing 1st Floor Shastri Bhawn New Delhi 11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : , A Choudhry,Kemo Lollen,Jyoti Prasad More,Amit Goyal,P Das,Topi Jini Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, DSGI Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 25-05-2026 Mr. K. Lollen, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on having been become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant