BASANTI LATA JENA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
W.P.(C)/306/2025 · 2025-01-13
Navin Chawla, Shalinder Kaur
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33579 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33579 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 306/2025
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 13.01.2025
+ W.P.(C) 306/2025
BASANTI LATA JENA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Negi, Mr. Arun Kumar, Mr. Naveen Gaur, Mr. Arun Nain & Ms. Sonal Bansal, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer, Mr. S.K. Singh, Mr. Ram Niwas Yadav, CRPF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
1. By the present petition, the petitioners pray for the grant of the Notional Monetary Benefits in replacement pay scale to the Petitioners with effect from 01.01.1996 to 10.10.1997, as per the ranks held by the petitioners as on 01.01.1996.
2. In support of their claims, the petitioners place reliance on the
Judgment dated 14.08.2024, of this Court in a batch of petitions, including W.P.(C). No. 1022/2023, titled Ajit Singh & Ors. vs. Union Digitally Signed By:NEELAM Signing Date:15.01.2025 18:57:16 Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 306/2025
of India & Ors.
3. Issue Notice.
4. Notice is accepted by Mr. Amit Kumar, the learned counsel for the respondents.
5. Having considered the contents of the petition, we are of the opinion that the respondents should consider the same as a representation of the petitioners and decide upon the same within a period of twelve weeks from today, especially keeping in view the
Judgment of this Court in Ajit Singh (supra).
6. In case the petitioners are held entitled to the reliefs as claimed, the same shall be released to the petitioners, however, restricted to a period commencing from three years prior to the date of filing of the present writ petition. In case the claims of the petitioners are rejected for any reason, a reasoned order thereof, shall be communicated to the petitioners, and it shall be open to the petitioners to challenge the same in accordance with law. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present petition.
7. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J JANUARY 13, 2025/ab/sk/IK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any By:NEELAM Signing Date:15.01.2025 18:57:16