Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33577 (MAD)

THE GENERAL MANAGER, v. B.SEKAR

REV.APLW/154/2025 · 2025-07-16

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rev.Appln(W).No.154 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Review Application(W) No.154 of 2025 The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram Div.II) Ltd., Vellore Region, Rangapuram, Vellore – 632 009. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. B.Sekar, 2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employee Pension Fund Trust, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule-1 r/w Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, to review the order dated 30.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.1782 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ashwin For Ms.S.Pavithra For Respondents For R1 : Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Appln(W).No.154 of 2025 ORDER This petition has been filed to review the order dated 30.01.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.1782 of 2024, thereby directing the petitioner to revise the first respondent's pension from the date of his retirement by taking note of his entire service and disburse the arrears within a period of twelve weeks. 2. The first respondent filed the above Writ Petition for direction directing the petitioner and the second respondent to revise his pension from the date of retirement by taking note of his entire service. This Court by an order dated 28.03.2024, allowed the writ petition and also directed the petitioner to revise the first respondent's pension from the date of his retirement by taking note of his entire service and disburse the arrears within a period of twelve weeks. To review the said order, the present Review Application has been filed by the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Appln(W).No.154 of 2025 4. Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner raised so many grounds on merits, all the grounds raised by the petitioner are the grounds to challenge the order passed by this Court. This Court finds no apparent error on the face of records as such, the petitioner failed to make any grounds to review the order passed by this Court. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court finds no merits in this Review Application to review the order dated 30.01.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.1782 of 2024 . It is also made clear that while calculating the revised pension from the date of retirement by taking note of entire service of the first respondent, the petitioner shall bear the contribution to be paid to the pension trust. 5. Accordingly, the Review Application stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost. 16.07.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No rts https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rev.Appln(W).No.154 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. rts To 1. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employee Pension Fund Trust, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. Review Application(W) No.154 of 2025 16.07.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis