Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33575 (CAL)

ROCKY SARKAR @ JULFIAKR SARKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/1156/2025 · 2025-08-11

Bivas Pattanayak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.08.2025 Item No.3 Daily List Court No.42 ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA. CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (M) 1156 of 2025 In re : An Application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Tapan Police Station Case No.259 of 2025 dated 20.04.2025 under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, read with Sections 4/17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, read with Sections 137(2)/62 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, (corresponding G.R. Case no.835 of 2025, and Special Case No.34 of 2025) pending before the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Balurghat, Dakhin Dinajpur, charge sheet already submitted being no.343 of 2025 dated 16.06.2025; under section 64 of the BNS, read with Section 4/17 of the POCSO Act, read with Sections 137(2)/62 of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Rocky Sarkar @ Julfiakr Sarkar … … Petitioner Ms. Baisali Basu, Ms. Eshita Dutta … …For the State The matter is appearing under the heading “To Be Mentioned”. Inadvertent typographical error has crept into the order dated 28th July, 2025 mentioning the names of the learned advocates, “Md. Adil Badr and Mr. Prakash Mishra” for the State instead of “Ms. Baisali Basu and Ms. Eshita Dutta”. Let the names of leaned advocates, “Ms. Baisali Basu and Ms. Eshita Dutta” be read for the State in the order dated 28th July, 2025 instead of “Md. Adil Badr and Mr. Prakash Mishra”. 2 The aforesaid order is modified to the above extent. Other portions of the aforesaid order shall remain unaltered. This order shall form part of the order dated 28th July, 2025. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)