Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33571 (KAR)

MR BESTOGI K ISAAC v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8155/2018 · 2025-07-08

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOS.8155-56/2018 (GM - POLICE) BETWEEN MR. BESTOGI K ISAAC, S/O K.J.ISAAC, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT MADE VILLAGE AND POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 201. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADV.(ABSENT)) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VINAYAKA TEMPLE ROAD, JUNIOR COLLEGE ROAD, MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 201. 2 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RURAL POLICE STATION, SENIOR COLLEGE JUNCTION, COLLEGE ROAD, MADIKERI, KODAGU – 571 201. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.BALAKRISHNA, AGA) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY R-3 DATED 23.10.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE – E AND CONSEQUENTLY ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING R-3 TO REGISTER FIRST INFORMATION REPORT BASED ON THE COMPLAINT DATED 19.08.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE – D AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER Sri B. Balakrishna, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. None appears for the petitioner today and even on 03.07.2019 also, none represented the petitioner. 3 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petitions. 3. Accordingly, writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE nvj