[2025:RJ-JP:36669-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 2247/2024 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No.47/2023 Ramavtar Singh Jadaun Son Of Pritam Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Gurja Police Station Sabalgarh, District Murena Madhya Pradesh At Present Tenant In The House Of Shri Prabhat Mali Jai Bhawani Vihar, Vaidhaji Ka Chauraha Niwaru Road, Police Station Kardhani Jaipur And At Present Resident Of Niwaru Road, Vaidhya Ji Ka Chauraha Plot No. 41 Hanuman Vatika Jaipur (Raj) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajastahn, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aatish Jain, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Deputy Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 10/09/2025 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the present accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect [2025:RJ-JP:36669-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-2247/2024] that accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the sentence of similarly situated co-accused namely Dharmendra has already been suspended by this Court. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial and hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and the accused-applicant be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate opposed the present application seeking suspension of sentence. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial and also considering that the sentence of similarly situated co-accused has already been suspended and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time, we deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence of the present accused-applicant during the pendency of the appeal. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicant shall [2025:RJ-JP:36669-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-2247/2024] appear before this Court on 27.10.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/19