APHC010505962013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28047/2013 Between: 1. M/S. LAKSHMI GANAPATHI COTTONS,, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT. NANDURI DHANALALCSHMI, W/O TARAKA RAVINDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O FLATNO. 204, SRI SATYA SAI HOMES, H.NO.9-11-62, KALYANIVARI STREET KOTHAPET, GUNTUR - 522 001. 2. NADURI TARAKA RAVINDRA REDDY,, S/O. SRI RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 204, SRI SATYA SAI HOMES, H.NO.9-11-62, KALYANIVARI STREET, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR - 522 001. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REGIONAL MANAGER, OPP: BIRLA TEMPLE, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA GUNTUR BRANCH, KANNAVARITHORA, GUNTUR - 522 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS RELATIONSHIP MANAGER (ME). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent bank issuing the impugned letter dated 11.09.2013 to the extent of holding out 2 threats to the petitioners to publish their photographs in newspapers as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents for bear from publishing the photographs of the petitioners/guarantors in any newspapers/magazine as contemplated in the impugned letter dated 11.09.2013 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 3427 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the Interim order granted in WPMP No 34828/2013 in WP No 28047/2013 dated 27.09.2013 IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 34828 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to publish the photographs and the name of the petitioners/guarantors, in the newspapers/ magazine pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 155985 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Sri V.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 3 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 03.07.2025 SNI 4 119 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.28047 of 2013 Dated: 03.07.2025 SNI