Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33561 (AP)

SAATVIK ENGINEERING WORKS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25903/2025 · 2025-09-21

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010505132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25903/2025 Between: 1. SAATVIK ENGINEERING WORKS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER BUTU GOWRINAIDU, S/O.BUTU LAXMI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCCONTRACTOR, R/O.1-82-11 LIG-117 GF, SECTOR 3, MVP COLONY, LB COLONY (PO), VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERIV, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 8. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AP CFMS OFFICE, FLOOR, C- BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents not releasing the amount of Rs. 10,94,690/- vide M Book No. 403/2023-24/EE-IV, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e.. Construction of Community Hall adjacent to Reservoir near Satyanarayana Swamy Temple at Rangireejuveedhi in Ward No.36 of Zone-lV, vide Agreement No. 182/ 2022- 23/ EE-IV/ DB/ GVMC/ Dt. 03.11.2022 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay for payment of amount of Rs. 10,94,690/- vide M Book No. 403/2023-24/EE-IV with interest @24PERCENT per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Please to direct the respondents to pay for payment of amount of Rs. 10,94,690/- vide M Book No. 403/2023-24/EE-IV with interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e. Construction of Community Hall adjacent to Reservoir near Satyanarayana Swamy Temple at Rangireejuveedhi in Ward No.36 of Zone- IV, vide Agreement No. 182/ 2022-23/ EE-IV/ DB/ GVMC/ Dt. 03.11.2022, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and property in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25903 of 2025 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has executed works, as entrusted by the respondents vide Agreement No.182/2022-23/EE-IV/DB/GVMC, dated 03.11.2022, and submitted final bills. It is submitted that the competent authority has also recorded the progress of works and certified the works in the M-Book. It is submitted that, an amount of Rs.10,94,690/- is due and payable by the respondents to the petitioner. Though the works progress was recorded in the M-Book, no amounts have been forth coming. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, the learned Government Pleader for the Finance & Planning and the learned Standing Counsel. 3. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 does not dispute the completion of work. 4. Considering the submissions, there shall be a direction to the concerned respondents to verify and release the admitted amount within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:22.09.2025 NKA 5 46 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25903 of 2025 Date: 22.09.2025 NKA