DEEPANSHU MEENA S/O LATE SHRI RAMDHAN MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/718/2025 · 2025-01-17
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3355 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3355 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2460] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 718/2025 Deepanshu Meena S/o Late Shri Ramdhan Meena, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Atarda, Police Station Karwar, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 17/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.748/2024, registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District-Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 331(3) and 305(a) of B.N.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offences under Sections 331(3) and 305(a) of B.N.S., 2023. It is argued that the petitioner is behind the bars since long and the charge-sheet has already been produced and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is
[2025:RJ-JP:2460] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-718/2025] habitual offender and against him twelve cases of similar nature are registered, therefore bail application of both the accused- petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and charge-sheet has already been submitted and the matter is triable by Magistrate, trial of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioner- Deepanshu Meena S/o Late Shri Ramdhan Meena, in connection with FIR No.748/2024, registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District-Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:2460] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-718/2025] (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/31