CHIRUMAMILLA SRIKANTH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/302/2025 · 2025-01-21
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3355 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3355 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
I of><,z? \ JS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR/ TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.- 302 OF 2025 Between I- [3327] rl `prifeirm chI-rumamilla Srikanth, s/o c. Krl-shna Murthy, Aged 29 years, R/o.6-134, Oppl-cherla vI-llage, Karempud,-Mandal, palandu District. (petitioners name I-s shown in page No.2O para No.3 Line 13) Petitioner/Accused AND The State of Andhra pradesh, Rep. by its public Prosecutor High Court of Amaravathl-. Respondent/complaI-nant petition under sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed Ion Support of the criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner / Accused No 39 by granting Anticipatory Ba" in the event of his arrest in crime NO 199 of 2022 of Macherla Town poll'ce station, palanadu DI'StrjCt. The petjtI'On coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petitI'On and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. popuRI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA, Advocate for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the following,-
CRIMINAL P ORDER: The Criminal Petition, u/See.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, is filed On behalf Of the Petitioner/A39 to grant anticipatory bail in connect'IOn With Crime No.199/2022 of Macherla Town Police Station, Palnadu District. 2- A case has been registered against the PetitiOnar and Others for the offences punishable under sect'lons 143, 147, 148, 448, 427, 436, 323 and 149 lPC. 3. Thecase of the prosecution in briefiSthat: The defacto comPlainant iS a resident Of Plot nO.303 in Pavani Apartment, Macherla and her husband iS a Telugu Desam Party activist. on 16.12.2022, one member Of the then OPPOSitiOn Party Went tO attend a programme. ln that programme, there was a clash ensued between the members of TDP party and YSRCP party. ln that 'lnCident, the accused and some others formed themselves into unlawful assembly and set ablaze the vehicle of TDP party. Later, they Went tO SOCiety colony and destroyed the TDP party OffllCe.
Subsequently, a" the accused reached the apartment of the defacto complainant armed with sticks and stones and damaged the cars and motorcycles which were _=,- .-..'` i== =Fb I
€ -__\ r/ parked ln the park,ng area and also rushed to the house of the defacto complal'nant and damaged the fumjture. 4. Heard. perusedtherecord. 5. A perusal of the material aval-lable on record goes to show that name of the petjtjoner has not been referred I-n the Fl-rst lnformatl'on Report At a belated stage, after lapse of two years, po'ICe examl-ned some wl-tnesses and they alleged to have stated name of the petjtjoner hereln that he along wlth others trespassed l'nto the house of the defacto complaI'nant and damaged the furniture lan the house of the defacto complaI'nant. As the name of this petitioner was not mentioned jn the Flrst lnformatl.on Report, and after lapse of two years, based on the statement of wltnesses, name of petjtjoner I®S figured ln the crl'me and as the petitl'oner ls apprehendlng arrest, thl's court l's I'nClined to grant the prayer of the petI-tl-Oner/A39 for grant of antjcjpatory bail. 6. AccordI'ngly, ln the event of hI'S arrest wl'th regard to thls crlme, petI'tlOner/A39 sha" be released on ba" on hloS executlng a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), with two suretles each for the llke sum to the satlsfactl'on of the arres{l'ng pollce offlclalS and also on condl'tIOn that the petjtI'Oner sha" make hI'mSelf available for investI-gatjon as and when required and that he sha" not cause any threat, I-nducement or promise to the prosecutI-On Witnesses. c f3i3f3Zal
The petI.tI-Oner sha" appear before the concerned station House offI'Cer, Once jn a week l'.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and O5.00 p.m., tI'II filing of the charge-sheet. 7. Accordingly, the criminal PetI'tiOn iS allowed. i sD:AN*INTA_G_A M M A IITRUE COPYII FL AS::SCTT:ie##o-=FAG=¥:MTEA=RAR To,
1. The Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Macherla. 2. The S.H.O., Macherla Town Police Station, Palanadu District
3. One CC to Ms.
POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITAAdvocate [OPUC]
4. Two cos to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT]
5. One spare copy KJ
// +
SRK,J DATED:21/01/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.302 of 2025 ALLOWED )23 I/A,N 2025 iT3.I?-