Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33542 (RAJ)

ARBAZ S/O JALLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14791/2024 · 2025-02-06

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5235] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.14791/2024 1. Arbaz S/o Jalli, 2. Nasir S/o Harun, 3. Noman S/o Iqbal, 4. Akram S/o Harun, 5. Hasim S/o Sapeek, All residents of Jhenjhpuri, Police Station Kaithwada, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present petitioners Confined In Jail, Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.191/2024, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Section 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the accused-petitioners are in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:5235] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14791/2024] 28.10.2024 and the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. It is also argued that there are no criminal antecedents against all the accused-petitioners and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. There are no criminal antecedents against all the accused-petitioners, the accused-petitioners are in custody since 28.10.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Arbaz S/o Jalli, 2. Nasir S/o Harun, 3. Noman S/o Iqbal, 4. Akram S/o Harun and 5. Hasim S/o Sapeek, in connection with FIR No.191/2024, registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-25