PRESIDENT ANJUMAN E ISLAM v. KALAL SAMAJ SEVA SANGAH
RP/100020/2022 · 2025-04-26
Sachin Shankar Magadum
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3354 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3354 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:11967 RP No. 100020 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REVIEW PETITION NO. 100020 OF 2022 IN R.S.A. NO.5479/2013 (POS) C/W R.S.A. NO.5478/2013 (POS)
BETWEEN:
1. PRESIDENT ANJUMAN E ISLAM DHARWAD-580001
2. SECRETARY ANJUMAN E-ISLAM DHARWAD-580001 …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. AHAMED ALI J RAHIMANSHA, [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
KALAL SAMAJ SEVA SANGAH, DHARWAD, R/BY ITS PANCHAS
PUNDALIKAPPA PARASHURAM KALAL AGE: MAJOR OCC:. BUSINESS R/O. NEAR HEAD QUARTER ROAD DHARWAD-580001
2.
PREMKANT AMBAJI KALAL AGE: MAJOR OCC: BUSINESS R/O. LINE BAZAAR
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:11967 RP No. 100020 of 2022
BHOSSAPPA CHOWK DHARWAD-580001
3.
JAGANATH HUSSAINAJI KALAL AGE: MAJOR OCC: BUSINESS R/O. LINE BAZAAR BHOSSAPPA CHOWK DHARWAD-580001
4.
THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA WAKF'S BOARD CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560005 …RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER 47 OF CPC, PRAYING TO JUDGMENT AND
ORDER PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN RSA NO.5479/2013 CONNECTED WITH RSA NO.5478/2013 DATED 11.01.2022 MAY KINDLY BE REVIEWED AND SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED ON DATED 11.01.2022 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
This review petition is pending since 2022. The counsel on record has consistently remained absent before this Court. Even on the previous occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even office objections are also not complied
- 3 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:11967 RP No. 100020 of 2022
inspite of granting sufficient time. It seems the review petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the review petition.
2. In that view of the matter, the review petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB List No.: 19 Sl No.: 2