Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3354 (AP)

KAKARLA MOHANA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP., REP BY PP & ANOTHER

CRLRC/893/2012 · 2025-06-30

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010015352012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ■in TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE present THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE CRIMINAL REVISION TAgc mi-.. Revision fiied under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. order dt 22.03.2012 made in M.C.No.171/2009 Cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Between: . Kakarla Mohana Rao, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about - Madiga, R/o Chinna Obinenipalli Village, Besthavaripeta Prakasam District, Presently working Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation Prakasam District-523333 Y. LAKSHMANA RAO 893 OF 2017 aggrieved by the on the file of the Family Court- Judge Court at Vijayawada. 47 years, Hindu," ; , I Mandal, as Senior Assistant, Office of the Sub-Division APSPDCL Cumbiim. ...Petitioner/Respondeht AND 1. The State of A.P. Hyderabad. 2. Kakarla Shanti, W/o years. Housewife, R/o D.No.53 Rep by Its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP. at Mohan Rao, D/o K.Yob, -04-48-4, Christurajapuram Christian, Aged about 37 Vijayawada V -Respondents/Petitioners Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri K S Murthy Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following order: <- (;■ f;- 'iJ 't ! .V - i APHC010015352012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] ■JSJ / TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 893/2012 Between: ...PETITIONER Kakarla Mohana Rao AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State of AP Rep By PP and others r Counsel for the Petitioner: 4K Sunkara Rajendra Prasad Counsel for the Respondent(S): I.K. S. Murthy 2. Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr Suhas, learned counsel representing Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, < the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that they are not pressing the criminal revision case and that it may be dismissed asjiot pressed. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as not 2. pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 Dr.YLRJ Crl.R.C.No.893 of2012 Dated 01.07.2025 m As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, District and Sessions Judge Court Family Court-Cum-lV Additional 1. The at Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. One CC to Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad Advocate [OPUC] Sri K S Murthy Advocate [OPUC] 3. OneCCto 4. Two CC’s to Amaravati [OUT] Section Officer, Criminal Section, Court of Andhra Pradesh at The Public Prosecutor, High High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. The 6. THREE CD Copies SAM AL •fi i / HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 i f ORDER CRLRC No. 893 of 2012 ^ 2 0 SEP 2025 ^•-^sasaisaiSS^ >o J/nf fer' DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS NOT PRESSED i. i i