Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3353 (PNJ)

SURINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/66751/2025 · 2026-01-19

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-66751 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (206) Surinder Singh State of Punjab CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. petitioner in case 323, 376-D, 506 of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, at Police Station Sadar Fazilka, District Fazilka. 2. concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. 3. petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial i longer required. 4. 03.12.2025 absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when 66751-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Surinder Singh Versus State of Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Jagjit Singh Gill, Advocate with Mr. Prabhpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0047 dated 24.03.2024, registered under Sections D, 506 of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, at Police Station Sadar Fazilka, District Fazilka. Vide order dated 03.12.2025, concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial i longer required. In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-66751-2025 Date of Decision:- 19.01.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN Mr. Jagjit Singh Gill, Advocate with Mr. Prabhpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the FIR No.0047 dated 24.03.2024, registered under Sections D, 506 of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, at Police Station , this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join Learned State counsel, on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when 1 19.01.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent The present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the FIR No.0047 dated 24.03.2024, registered under Sections D, 506 of IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, at Police Station this Court while granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail directed the petitioner to join Learned State counsel, on instructions submits that the nterrogation is no In view of above, the petition is allowed. The order dated granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when MANJU 2026.01.20 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-66751 called upon to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the conditions of Section 482 BNSS. 5. expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 6. any such activity once again, automatically stand vacated. 7. as parity qua January 19, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 66751-2025 on to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the conditions of Section 482 BNSS. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. It is made clear that, in case, the petition any such activity once again, the present concession granted shall automatically stand vacated. However, it is made clear that this order shall not be construed qua any other co-accused. January 19, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No 2 on to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final expression of opinion on the merits of the case. It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is found involved in the present concession granted shall However, it is made clear that this order shall not be construed (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 2 on to do so by the Investigating Agency and shall abide by the However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final er is found involved in the present concession granted shall However, it is made clear that this order shall not be construed MANJU 2026.01.20 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document