Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3353 (JHR)

MANOJ KUMAR BESHRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./371/2025 · 2025-01-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 371 of 2025 Manoj Kumar Beshra, Age 40 years Son of Krishan Charan Beshra, Resident of Village Dahuwatand, Post office –Fulchi, P.S –Gandey, District- Giridih, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Priya Tudu D/O Ramlal Tudu, Village and Post –Chirudih, P.S- Bengabad, District -Giridih … Opp. Parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhash Ch. Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha , Addl.PP 02 / 24.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1232 of 2023 registered under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the complainant-opposite party no. 2, treated the opposite party no. 2 with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and because of marital discord, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to resume conjugal life with the opp. party no. 2. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes to keep and maintain the opposite party no. 2 with full dignity and honour as his lawful wife, as and when the opposite party no. 2, becomes ready to resume conjugal life with the petitioner hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 25,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Giridih in connection with Complaint Case No. 1232 of 2023 subject to the condition that the petitioner will keep and maintain the opposite party no. 2 with full dignity and honour as his lawful wife, as and when the opposite party no. 2, becomes ready to resume conjugal life with the petitioner and will co-operate with the trial of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-