Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33525 (KAR)

M/S SHARPWATCH INVESTIGATION AND v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/26398/2024 · 2025-01-16

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1625 WP NO.26398 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.26398 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S. SHARPWATCH INVESTIGATION AND SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD., (COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT) NO.17, 1ST FLOOR, 8TH CROSS, KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU - 570 009. REP. BY ITS MANAGER SRI. RAMACHANDRA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.L. JAGADEESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SMT. RAKSHITHA D.J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (AN AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA) REP. BY ITS DEAN AND DIRECTOR, SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. ALLAH BAKASH M., ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1625 WP NO.26398 OF 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE CLAUSE 9 OF THE TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 20TH AUGUST, 2024 BEARING NO.BLCMCRI/E- TENDER/08/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2, DEAN-DIRECTOR, ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05TH SEPTEMBER, 2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed memo dated 16th January, 2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. 2. Yesterday, when the matter had come up, this Court had noted the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 that the petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition No.7894 of 2022 being aggrieved of similar clauses in the Tender Notification namely the condition Nos.7 and 9 and this Court had held that such conditions are not unreasonable nor arbitrary. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1625 WP NO.26398 OF 2024 3. The Memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16